Scientists are not highly trusted in the US. According to a poll carried out by the Pew Research Center in December 2021, only 29 percent of adult Americans say they have a "great deal" of trust that scientists generally act in the public's best interests.
Trust in science varies dramatically by political partisanship. In that same poll, only 13% of respondents who vote or lean Republican expressed a "great deal" of trust in scientists, compared to 43 percent of those who vote or lean Democrat.
The sources of right-wing suspicion towards science have been explored in depth. According to one study in the Fall 2022 issue of Daedalus, for example, conservatives mistrust science because it is associated with government attempts to regulate the marketplace - think climate change policy. Skepticism towards science, the authors argue, "is mostly collateral damage, a spillover from carefully orchestrated conservative distrust of government."
Others argue that conservative skepticism of science stems from the under-representation of Republicans among the ranks of scientists themselves. Thus, when scientists wind up recommending policies that the government advocates, Republicans believe that "mainstream science is corrupted by ideology and amounts to no more than politics by another name." Republicans have become "alienated from a mainstream scientific community that by and large doesn’t share their political beliefs."
There is deep mistrust of science on the extreme left, however, including many in academia.
Today, the New York Times published a piece chronicling the attempt of a prominent group of scientists to publish an academic article arguing that scientific efforts should try, as much as possible, to purge themselves of ideological or partisan belief.
Multiple mainstream academic journals rejected the piece, forcing it to eventually appear in a minor, little-read publication called The Journal of Controversial Ideas.
You'd have to read the New York Times piece, and then the article itself, to learn the ins and outs of the debate. However, the authors said that scientific truth was separate from the sociological (race, class, gender) identity of the scientists.
That argument, one set of reviewers said, was "hurtful."
This country's culture wars leave no stone unturned.
About James Ron
Learn more about James on his website and LinkedIn profile. To read his scholarly articles, please visit James' ResearchGate and Academia.edu profiles. To learn how other scholars have used his work in their own research, visit his Google Scholar page. You can read James' social science blog here and his personal blog here.
Follow James Ron on social media
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jamesron2/
Twitter: https://x.com/james_ron01
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/JamesRonMN/
Facebook author page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61560278953063
Comments